All of you amazon.com fans may have noticed that they recently revamped their recommended section. It is quite nice, actually. The main recommendation page has links to categories of things in which you might be interested. For example, on my page the list includes such categories as ADV films, Experimental Rock, Geneon, Japanese, Chinese, Television, &tc. And the items in these categories are pretty good; some I would consider buying, others not so much. I will admit, I think amazon could do a slightly better job on that. Netflix actually has a very good system, and a number of their recommendations have gone on my queue. However, to refocus, one of the categories in my recommendation page is literature, of which I am rather fond. So, when I clicked on the literature link I expected to find, well, literature, books by Joyce, Faulkner, or Conrad. Instead, I found a bunch of links to manga and the hardcover edition of The Chamber of Secrets (which I already own in softcover). Now, I do enjoy some manga, and given that I have been buying quite a bit recently from amazon it is to be expected that they would be recommending manga to me out the yin-yang. But putting it under literature? A fallacy, I say! Manga, and other graphic novels, while good reading, are not what I want to see under literature. This is not to discount them on their literary merits in any way. Just, I expect the classics there, is all. Needless to say, amazon’s recommendations could stand some improvement. And a frank discussion on what “literature” truly is!